<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2550-6587</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista de Ciencias Humanísticas y Sociales (ReHuSo)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[ReHuSo]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2550-6587</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Técnica de Manabí ]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2550-65872023000200157</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33936/rehuso.v8i2.5901</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[¿Qué observan los docentes? la revisión en línea de proyectos de tesis en una universidad del sur del Perú]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[What do teachers observe? Online review of thesis projects at a university in southern Peru]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vilca Colquehuanca]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gustavo Luis]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Medina Vilca]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gustavo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Otazu Conza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Francisco Euler]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Juliaca  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Perú</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional del Altiplano  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Perú</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Federal de Pelotas  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brasil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>157</fpage>
<lpage>170</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2550-65872023000200157&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2550-65872023000200157&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2550-65872023000200157&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen La realización del proyecto de investigación genera en los tesistas un conjunto de incertidumbres y ansiedades asociadas a la revisión que realizan los docentes revisores de tesis y a los juicios valorativos que emiten (observaciones del revisor). En este estudio se busca analizar las observaciones realizadas por los revisores de los proyectos de tesis de pregrado en una universidad del sur del Perú. El estudio tiene un carácter cualitativo, basado fundamentalmente en una metodología de análisis de contenido. Se recopilaron 497 observaciones efectuadas por los jurados a un conjunto de 24 proyectos de tesis presentados en el semestre académico 2022-1. Se codificaron dichas observaciones según criterios de ocurrencia para determinar patrones que ayuden a caracterizar el modo en que los revisores emiten sus observaciones en un contexto asíncrono y anónimo. Para el procesamiento de los datos se utilizó el software Atlas ti. Los resultados sugieren que las observaciones de los jurados presentan tres patrones complementarios: primero, observaciones centradas en la edición y formato del proyecto; segundo, observaciones centradas en las deficiencias de redacción y ortografía; y finalmente, el tercer patrón trata de observaciones superficiales abocadas a cuestiones de contenido. Se concluye que la forma cómo son reportadas las observaciones de los jurados no ayudan mucho a los tesistas a mejorar sus tesis, generando al contrario el riesgo de producir investigaciones de baja calidad.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract The realization of the research project generates in the thesis students a set of uncertainties and anxieties associated with the review carried out by the thesis reviewers and the evaluative judgments they make (reviewer's observations). This study seeks to analyze the observations made by the reviewers of undergraduate thesis projects at a university in southern Peru. The study is qualitative in nature, based fundamentally on a content analysis methodology. A total of 497 observations made by the jurors to a set of 24 thesis projects presented in the 2022-1 academic semester were compiled. These observations were coded according to occurrence criteria to determine patterns that help characterize the way in which reviewers issue their observations in an asynchronous and anonymous context. Atlas ti software was used to process the data. The results suggest that the jurors' observations present three complementary patterns: first, observations focused on the editing and formatting of the project; second, observations focused on writing and spelling deficiencies; and finally, the third pattern deals with superficial observations focused on content issues. It is concluded that the way in which the jurors' observations are reported does not help the thesis writers to improve their theses, generating on the contrary the risk of producing low quality research.]]></p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Los centros de escritura: entre nivelación académica y construcción de conocimiento]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arango]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Cadernos de Pesquisa]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<numero>165</numero>
<issue>165</issue>
<page-range>872-95</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gerring]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Case Study Research. Principles and Practices]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The art of peer reviewing: Toward an effective developmental process]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hall]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Public Affairs Education]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>296-313</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hernández-Sampieri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta.]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Mc Graw Hill Education]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Examiners&#8217; reports on theses: Feedback or assessment?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kumar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of English for Academic Purposes,]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>211-22</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reviewing the Review: An Assessment of Dissertation Reviewer Feedback Quality]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lehan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>45-60</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Ley N° 30220.</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Ley Universitaria. Normas Legales]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Diario El Peruano]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evidencias psicométricas iniciales de una Escala de Maltrato al Asesorado de Tesis (EMAT).]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mamani-Benito]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O. J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Educación Médica]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>298-304</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[SAGE]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Policy borrowing for a world-class university: a case of a writing center in Japan.]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Okuda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Current Issues in Language Planning]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>503-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La revisión cientifica. Qué miran los revisores.]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Comunicar]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Expectativas y tensiones en la asesoría de tesis en la Facultad de Educación de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Revilla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>277</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Peer Reviews in Scientific Journals: Recommendations from ODOVTOS]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reyes-Carmona]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences,]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>20-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schreier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[SAGE Publications]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[How to Become a More Effective Reviewer.]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Snyder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K. E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gifted Child Quarterly]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>62</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>251-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
