<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1390-8626</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Sophia, Colección de Filosofía de la Educación]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Sophia]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1390-8626</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Politécnica Salesiana]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1390-86262022000100225</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17163/soph.n32.2022.07</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Afrontar la posverdad desde un fundamento neo-aristotélico de la educación]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Facing post-truth from a neo-aristotelian foundation of education]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schutijser De Groot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Dennis]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aaf"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Francia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Ecuador</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>32</numero>
<fpage>225</fpage>
<lpage>243</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1390-86262022000100225&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1390-86262022000100225&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1390-86262022000100225&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen El desafío actual de la posverdad que amenaza el funcionamiento de la democracia surge desde los límites de nuestro conocimiento y la interferencia de las emociones y los valores. Dos corrientes comunes, la ética del discurso, y la política agonista, son insuficientes para resolver este desafío. En la comprensión de la política de Aristóteles estos dos elementos ya estaban presentes. Él presenta a la política como un campo de saber determinado no exclusivamente por el saber, sino al mismo tiempo por los límites del saber y por el cargo emotivo. El objetivo de este artículo es proponer una concepción contemporánea de un discurso político phronético, incorporando las características clave de una phronesis aristotélica. La hipótesis es que un discurso político phronético contemporáneo no se puede fundar en el bien, ya que la pluralidad de las concepciones del bien es lo que separa la política moderna de los tiempos aristotélicos. En su lugar, y siguiendo a los debates en la ética neo-aristotélica, se debería buscar el fundamento en el desarrollo del carácter de los (futuros) participantes en dicho discurso. Por consiguiente, la educación es el punto de partida esencial para reforzar las capacidades y los hábitos de los participantes del discurso a fin de mejor manejar, en la medida de lo posible, las limitaciones de nuestro conocimiento y nuestro compromiso personal con el campo político.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract The current challenge of post-truth that threatens the functioning of democracy, arises from the limits of knowledge and the interference of emotions and values. Two common schools of thought, discourse ethics and agonist politics, fall short of resolving this challenge. In Aristotle&#8217;s understanding of Politics, these both elements are already present. He presents politics as a field of knowledge determined not only by knowledge as such, but also by the limits inherent in that knowledge and the emotive weight. The aim of the present article is to propose a contemporary conception of a phronetic political discourse, incorporating the key characteristics of an Aristotelian understanding of phronesis. The proposed hypothesis is that such a phronetic political discourse in a contemporary context cannot be founded on the good, as the plurality of conceptions of the good is what separates modern politics from Aristotelian times. Instead, and following debates in neo-Aristotelian ethics, the foundation should be sought in the character development of (future) participants in said discourse. Education is, then, the key starting point to enforce the capabilities and habits of discourse participants required to best manage, as far as this is possible, the limitations of our knowledge and our personal commitment to the political realm.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Posverdad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[discurso político]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Aristóteles]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[phronesis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[valores]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[carácter]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Post-truth]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[political discourse]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Aristotle]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[phronesis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[values]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[character]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<given-names><![CDATA[Aristóteles.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Metafísica]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<given-names><![CDATA[Aristóteles.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Retórica]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<given-names><![CDATA[Aristóteles.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Política]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<given-names><![CDATA[Aristóteles.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ética Nicomáquea; Ética Eudemia]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aubenque,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pierre.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La prudence chez Aristote]]></source>
<year>1963</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blackburn,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Simon.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[On Truth]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cavell,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stanley.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Cities of Words]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El diálogo filosófico como Aventura y experiencia que cura]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Escobar,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Andrés]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramírez,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[César.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Sophia, colección de Filosofía de la Educación]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Habermas,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jürgen.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Conciencia moral y acción comunicativa]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[&#8216;There are no facts&#8230;&#8217; Nietzsche as Predecessor of Post-Truth?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heit,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Helmut.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Studia Philosophica Estonica]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hobbes,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thomas.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Leviathan]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kirk,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Geoffrey S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raven,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John Earle.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Presocratic Philosophers. A Critical History with a Selection of Texts]]></source>
<year>1957</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laclau,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ernesto]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mouffe,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Chantale.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hegemonía y estrategia socialista]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Macintyre,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alisdair.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[After Virtue]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morin,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edgar.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La Méthode 6]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morin,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edgar.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Introduction à la pensée complexe]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Murdoch,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Iris.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Sovereignty of Good]]></source>
<year>1970</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nussbaum,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Martha.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Upheavals of Thought]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nietzsche,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Friedrich.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Segunda consideración intempestiva. Sobre la utilidad y los inconvenientes de la Historia para la vida]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<given-names><![CDATA[Platón.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Diálogos VI]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Slote,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Michael.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Moral Sentimentalism]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Swanton,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Christine.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van Zyl,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Liezl.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Virtue Ethics]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
