SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número2Trail Making Test TMT: Primera Aproximación A Las Propiedades Psicométricas En Población Ecuatoriana AdultaAnálisis Clínico Y Evolutivo De Pacientes Con Estado Epiléptico Refractario Acorde El Esquema De Tratamiento De Tercera Línea Utilizado. índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Ecuatoriana de Neurología

versión On-line ISSN 2631-2581versión impresa ISSN 1019-8113

Rev Ecuat Neurol vol.32 no.2 Guayaquil jul./sep. 2023

https://doi.org/10.46997/revecuatneurol32200055 

Original Article

Number Of Neurologists And Neurology Training Programs Available In The Public Health System Of Ecuador: Analysis And Recommendations

Número De Neurólogos Y Programas De Entrenamiento En Neurología Disponibles En El Sistema De Salud Público Del Ecuador: Análisis Y Recomendaciones

Daniel Moreno-Zambrano1 

Joffre A. Wong-Ayoub2 

Martha Arevalo-Mora3 

Iliana San Andrés-Suárez2 

David Santana2 

Joyce Meza-Venegas2 

Eric Urquizo-Rodríguez2 

Joyce Jimenez-Zambrano4 

Rocio Garcia-Santibanez5 

1Larkin Community Hospital, Department of Neurology. Miami, United States. <danielmorenozambrano@gmail.com>

2Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil. Guayaquil, Ecuador.

3Universidad de Especialidades Espiritu Santo. Samborondón, Ecuador.

4University of North Dakota, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Neurology. Grand Forks, United States.

5Emory University, School of Medicine, Department of Neurology. Atlanta, United States.


Abstract

Introduction:

In 2008, Ecuador's neurologic healthcare profile displayed significant needs, a lack of neurologists, and neurology training accessibility. In that year, a new constitution introduced universal health care. No publication analyzes Ecuador's neurological Public Healthcare capacity. Hence, an up-to-date analysis of the number of neurologists and neurology training programs is required.

Objective:

Determine if Ecuador's public healthcare meets the minimum ideal ratio recommended by the World Health Organization of 1 neurologist per 100,000 population and the number of neurology training programs in Ecuador.

Methods:

Cross-sectional analysis of public data until November 2022 from Ecuador's Public Health System (PHS) and the Council of Higher Education. Ratios were calculated using the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses' information.

Results:

The public health network had ninety-four neurologists. Most found in Pichincha (37/39.4%) and Guayas (24/25.5%). There was one per province in five provinces. No neurologists were available in eight provinces. Two provinces met the ideal ratio. Ecuador’s ratio was 0.54:100,000 neurologists per population. One neurology training program was found in Quito.

Conclusion:

Ecuador's PHS has a shortage of neurologists, unfulfilling the minimum ideal ratio, and a severe lack of neurology training. Decentralizing neurological services, primary care support, and governmental funding for neurology training are an urgent need.

Keywords: Public Health; Postgraduate Education; Neurology; Ecuador

Abstracto

Introducción:

En el 2008, el perfil de salud neurológico ecuatoriano presentaba importantes déficits, escasez de neurólogos e inaccesibilidad a residencias en neurología. Ese año una nueva constitución introdujo atención médica universal. Ninguna publicación ha analizado la capacidad de atención neurológica del Sistema de Salud Pública (SSP) del Ecuador. Un análisis actualizado del número de neurólogos y residencias neurológicas es necesario.

Objetivo:

Determinar el número de programas en neurología y si el SSP ecuatoriano cumple con el ratio ideal mínimo recomendado por la Organización Mundial de la Salud de 1 neurólogo por cada 100.000 habitantes.

Métodos:

Análisis transversal de datos hasta noviembre, 2022 del SSP y del Consejo de Educación Superior del Ecuador. Los ratio se calcularon acorde al Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos.

Resultados:

El SSP cuenta con noventa y cuatro neurólogos. Mayormente en Pichincha (37/39,4%) y Guayas (24/25,5%). Hay uno por provincia en cinco provincias; ninguno en ocho provincias. Dos provincias cumplieron el ratio ideal. Existen 0,54:100.000 neurólogos/habitantes y una residencia de neurología en Quito.

Conclusión:

El SSP ecuatoriano tiene escasez de neurólogos, incumpliendo el ratio ideal mínimo, y déficit de residencias en neurología. La descentralización de servicios neurológicos, soporte atención primaria, y financiamiento gubernamental para creación de residencias en neurología son necesidades urgentes.

Palabras Claves: Salud Pública; Educación de Posgrado; Neurología; Ecuador

Introduction

Neurological disorders are the leading cause of disability and the second cause of death worldwide. In the past 30 years, the absolute number of deaths and people with disabilities owing to neurological diseases has risen, particularly in low and middle-income countries. Further neurological morbimortality increment is expected globally due to population growth, aging (1), and the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been associated with neurological complications (2). In the 2016 Global Burden Disease Study, Ecuador reported a 32.8% surplus in disability-adjusted life years attributable to neurological disorders for the last 25 years (3). In 2008, Cruz et al. described Ecuador's neurologic health profile as one displaying significant needs, aggravated by the lack of specialists concentrated in the principal cities, centralism, scarce primary care, and lack of neurology training (4). By the end of that year, the Ecuadorian Government adopted a new constitution focusing on health care rights and social reforms, prioritizing human resources, aiming to decrease the specialists' gap (5). Ecuador's Public Health System [PHS] current objective is to provide efficient and universal free health care coverage. For this, one to five neurologists per 100,000 population should become available (as per the World Health Organization's (WHO) ideal ratio) (6). To our knowledge, no publication analyzes Ecuador's capacity to supply the demand for public neurological health services based on the number of specialists per population ideal ratio or the availability of neurology training programs in the country. Hence, a current description and analysis of the number of available neurologists and neurology training programs in Ecuador's PHS is critical.

Materials and methods

Cross-sectional analysis of public records available up until November 2022 regarding the number of neurologists in the Ministry of Public Health (MSP) and the Ecuadorian Institute of Social Security (IESS) were reviewed; in addition to the official data on available training programs in Neurology per the Government Council for Higher Education (CES). Data from the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INEC) population projection was used for the ratio calculation (7). The data was entered and stored digitally in a spreadsheet using Microsoft© Office Excel© 2021 MSO (Microsoft Corporation, USA) program and subsequently exported and analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) SPSS 23 software. (IBM Corporation, USA).

Results

Ninety-four neurologists were found in Ecuador’s public health network, concentrated in the secondary (n=57/60.6%) and tertiary (n=37/39.4%) levels of care.

The provinces with the highest availability of neurologists were Pichincha 37 (39.4%), Guayas 24 (25.5%), and Manabí 7 (7.4%). Esmeraldas, Imbabura, Pastaza, Santa Elena, and Sucumbíos have one neurologist per province. The provinces with no neurologists are Bolívar, Carchi, Cotopaxi, Galápagos, Morona Santiago, Napo, Orellana, and Zamora Chinchipe (Table 1).

Table 1 Neurologists’ distribution per province 

Province Neurologists Population Ratio
Azuay 4 881394 0.45
Bolivar 0 209933 0.00
Cañar 3 281396 1.07
Carchi 0 186869 0.00
Chimborazo 2 524004 0.38
Cotopaxi 0 488716 0.00
El Oro 2 715751 0.28
Esmeraldas 1 591083 0.17
Galápagos 0 33042 0.00
Guayas 24 4387434 0.55
Imbabura 1 476257 0.21
Loja 3 521154 0.58
Los Ríos 2 921763 0.22
Manabí 7 1562079 0.45
Morona Santiago 0 185494 0.00
Napo 0 144746 0.00
Orellana 0 161338 0.00
Pastaza 1 114202 0.88
Pichincha 37 3228233 1.15
Santa Elena 1 401178 0.25
Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas 3 511151 0.59
Sucumbíos 1 230503 0.43
Tungurahua 2 590600 0.34
Zamora Chinchipe 0 120416 0.00
Total 94 17468736 0.54

*Ratio: Number of neurologists per 100000 population.

The provinces most densely populated were Guayas with 4,387,434, Pichincha with 3,228,233, Manabí with 1,562,079, and Azuay with 881,394.

Regarding the number of neurologists per population ratio: Guayas has one neurologist for every 182,810 people, equivalent to 0.55 per 100,000 people. Pichincha has one neurologist for every 87,250 people (1.15:100,000). Manabí, one neurologist per 223,154 people (0.45:100,000), and Azuay, one neurologist for every 220,349 people (0.45:100,000).

The ideal ratio of one neurologist per 100,000 population is achieved by Cañar, with three neurologists available for a 281,396 population (1.07:100,000), and Pichincha, as previously mentioned, which holds the highest ratio.

The provinces farthest from the ideal ratio are Esmeraldas, with one neurologist per 591,083 people (0.17:100,000), Imbabura with one for every 476,257 (0.21:100,000), and Los Ríos, with one neurologist for every 460,882 individuals (0.22:100,000); not considering the provinces without neurologists, whose ratio is 0:100,000. With a total Ecuadorian population of 17,468,736 and 94 neurologists available in the PHS at the time, the ratio was 0.54:100,000 (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Distribution of Neurologists per provinces 

A single neurology training program was found in Quito. This program was approved and accredited by the CES in 2020 and is sponsored by a private university (Universidad De las Americas). The total duration of the program is 48 months and has thirty positions available for postgraduate training. It is self-financed, with a USD 115.00 application fee for selected applicants, a USD 4,600.00 registration fee, and a total tuition of USD 46,000.00. Its training sites are medical centers belonging to IESS, MSP, Police Social Security Institute (ISSPOL), Armed Forces Social Security Institute (ISSFA), and three other private hospitals (Table 2) (8)(9)(10)(11).

Table 2 Neurology Training Program in Ecuador 

Duration 48 months
Accreditation Period November 21, 2020 - October 21, 2026
Positions available 30
Financing Self-financed
Registration fee USD 4,600.00
Tuition USD 46,000.00
Location Quito Metropolitan District
Training Centers IESS - Hospital General San Francisco de Quito
ISSFA - Hospital de Especialidades Fuerzas Armadas No. 1
ISSPOL 𝝱 - Hospital de Quito No.1 Policia Nacional
MSP - Hospital del Adulto Mayor
MSP - Hospital Pablo Arturo Suarez
MSP - Hospital Especialidaes Eugenio Espejo
MSP - Hospital Pediatrico Baca Ortiz
MSP - Hospital General Docente Calderon
Private - Solca Núcleo de Quito
Private - Novaclínica Santa Cecilia
Private - Hospital Vozandes
University Universidad De Las Americas
CES* resolution Number RPC - SO - 23 - No. 502 - 2020
RPC - SO - 33 - No.519 - 2022

*⨥, IESS: Ecuadorian Institute of Social Security. ∑, ISSFA: Armed Forces Social Security Institute. 𝝱, ISSPOL: Police Social Security Institute. ⋕, MSP: Ministry of Public Health. *, CES: Council for Higher Education

Discussion

In 2008, Ecuador underwent critical structural changes in the organization of the public health institutions and the constitution towards the goal of providing Universal Health Coverage (UHC) [5,12]. Ecuador's health system comprises two sectors, the public and private (Figure 2). The public sector embodies 81% of healthcare establishments. Its main institutions are the MSP (47%) and IESS (24%), which jointly hold the largest medical infrastructure, followed by the ISSPOL and the ISSFA, representing approximately 10% of the public sector (13)(14). The private health infrastructure services represent a 19%, mainly harnessed by the upper and middle-income populations, who represent approximately 3% of Ecuadorians (5)(15). Therefore, almost 97% of the Ecuadorian population relies on the PHS. Ecuador's 2008 constitution states, "Health is a right guaranteed by the Government" (5)(12). Consequently, in aims to fulfill this goal concerning neurological health, the Ecuadorian Government should match the WHO recommendation of one neurologist per 100,000 population (6).

Figure 2 *Percentage of the Health System Infrastructure in Ecuador. # Ministry of Public Health. ⨥ Ecuadorian Institute of Social Security. ∑ Armed Forces Social Security Institute. 𝝱 Police Social Security Institute 

Recently, Rodriguez et al. analyzed the temporal and geographical distribution of medical specialists in Ecuador between 2000 to 2017, showing that the estimated number of neurologists increased from 159 to 220 (16). In this case, the total estimated ratio of neurologists per population is 1.23:100,000. Nevertheless, the Ecuadorian population mainly depends on the PHS (13)(14)(15), whose neurologists’ ratio per population is 0.54:100,000, hence insufficient for providing adequate neurological care. Regarding the geographical distribution of neurologists, our findings correlate with previous studies showing unequal distribution by province (16). Our results showed that 64.89% of the neurologists available in the PHS were found in the two largest provinces (Pichincha and Guayas).

Since 2010, to decentralize public services, the Ecuadorian Government created administrative levels of planning: zones, districts, and circuits to better identify needs and effectively provide public health services in each territory (13). According to the Health System’s zonal divisions, we adjusted our analysis, showing that only Zones Eight (Guayaquil, Samborondon, and Duran) and Nine (Metropolitan District of Quito) achieved the ideal ratio of neurologists per population (Table 3). Paradoxically, this administrative division does not consider users’ accessibility to services (Figure 3), potentially restricting openness to health services. Still, this requires further analysis beyond the scope of this study.

Table 3 Neurologists’ allocation per zones. 

MSP Zones Neurologists Population Ratio
Zone 1: Esmeraldas, Imbabura, Carchi, Sucumbíos 3 1484712 0.20
Zone 2: Napo, Orellana, Pichincha 0 752676 0.00
Zone 3: Cotopaxi, Tungurahua, Chimborazo, Pastaza 5 1717522 0.29
Zone 4: Manabí, Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas 10 2073230 0.48
Zone 5: Sta. Elena, Bolívar, Los Ríos, Galapagos y Guayas 3 3829895 0.08
Zone 6: Cañar, Azuay, Morona Santiago 7 1348284 0.52
Zone 7: El Oro, Loja, Zamora Chinchipe 5 1357321 0.37
Zone 8: Cantón de Guayaquil, Samborondón y Durán 24 2123455 1.13
Zone 9: Metropolitan District of Quito 37 2781641 1.33
Total 94 17468736 0.54

*† Pichincha province except for the Metropolitan district of Quito. ‡ Province of Guayas excluding Guayaquil, Durán and Samborondón.

Figure 3 Distribution of Neurologists per zones 

A possible solution is to boost postgraduate neurological training accessibility. Until 2007, Ecuador had at least five Neurology training programs (17). But in 2008, after the new constitutional framework, the country experienced multiple legal and institutional reforms in higher education and suspended the offer for new positions in postgraduate training (18). Presently in Ecuador, the training programs for medical specialties are offered by medical schools accredited by the Government and supervised by the MSP and CES. In 2014, the Government implemented a standard test to measure the theoretical knowledge of medical graduates wanting to practice medicine in Ecuador. However, the admission system for specialization programs is based on non-standardized tests. Most specialist training programs are not yearly available and are self-financed. A few are financed by the MSP or private hospitals with mandatory repayment working periods by graduates in the same institutions (16).

Our research found one neurology training program in the Metropolitan District of Quito. This program was approved in 2020; however, the application period started in 2022 and is self-financed. The total duration of the program is 48 months. It has thirty positions for postgraduate training. Its training sites are medical centers at IESS, MPH, ISSPOL, ISSFA, and three private hospitals (Table 2). Not an examination, but a graduation research project is required by the end of the residency for certification. There is no requirement to provide proof of continuing medical education after obtaining the neurology degree. The program is accredited by one private university, and trainees are required to pay their tuition while completing their training without receiving a salary or healthcare coverage (8)(9)(10)(11). Similarly, this has been previously described for some psychiatry postgraduate training programs in Ecuador (19).

Funding is necessary for effective neurology training. Even though international initiatives and funding have proved to be successful in this task (20)(21), the most effective systems in providing a higher number of medical specialists are the ones that are mainly financed by governmental initiatives and are part of public policies, as is the case of the Graduate Medical Education (GME) program in the United States and the Medical Specialists in training (MIR) program in Spain (22)(23). Ecuador is in imperative need of implementing a similar health policy as the aforementioned. Recently in 2022, a health policy known as "Health Career" was approved in Ecuador; nonetheless, this law did not include the concept of postgraduate medical training, failing to be useful as a public health policy with governmental funding (24).

The present study has several limitations. As a cross-sectional analysis, it cannot estimate the future neurologists' supply and healthcare demand. We consider this requires further assessment and should be addressed in future studies, as well as determining the prevalence of neurologic conditions in each geographic area. Our study made no distinction between urban and rural areas. Due to the difference in physician job responsibilities, more specialized neurologists are needed in urban areas and generalists in rural areas. Thus, the calculated neurologist-to-population ratios does not necessarily show the definite demand-supply balance in these regions. Similar studies should be conducted with this distinction. Additionally, we lack data on behalf of ISSFA and ISSPOL. Though attempts to obtain the data were made, the information was ultimately unavailable at the time of writing this manuscript. This limitation has been perceived in previous studies (19) due to the difficulty of gathering public data, either owing to the scarcity of information or the lack of governmental interest in developing research, making it a common drawback in Ecuador (25)(26).

Despite these limitations, the strength of this study lies in having analyzed 71% of health establishments in Ecuador (MSP and IESS) (8)(9) with recent and official data. This rich sample conveys reliable information on the current neurologist shortage. This research portrays the most recent population projections published by the INEC, providing supportive evidence that, in many areas of Ecuador, there is an inadequate supply of neurologists and a lack of training programs to compensate for the short supply, pointing further toward the lack of neurology training and funding scarcity for postgraduate education. These findings emphasize the urgency for developing new strategies to boost the number of neurologists, neurology training programs, and overall improvement of working conditions and resources.

Ecuador’s Public Healthcare has a shortage of neurologists, unfulfilling the minimum ideal ratio, together with a severe lack of neurology training programs and funding paucity for postgraduate education. Decentralizing neurologic services, primary care support, and governmental financial support for neurology training is compulsory.

References

Feigin VL, Vos T, Nichols E, Owolabi MO, Carroll WM, Dichgans M, Deuschl G, Parmar P, Brainin M, Murray C. The global burden of neurological disorders: translating evidence into policy. The Lancet Neurology. 2020 Mar 1;19(3):255-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30411-9 [ Links ]

Moreno-Zambrano D, Arévalo-Mora M, Freire-Bonifacini A, García-Santibanez R, Santibáñez-Vásquez R. Neurologic manifestations associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A neuro-review of COVID-19. Revista Ecuatoriana de Neurologia. 2020;29(1):115-24. https://doi.org/10.46997/REVECUATNEUROL29100115 [ Links ]

Feigin VL, Nichols E, Alam T, Bannick MS, Beghi E, Blake N, Culpepper WJ, Dorsey ER, Elbaz A, Ellenbogen RG, Fisher JL. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology. 2019 May 1;18(5):459-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X [ Links ]

Cruz ME, Jenkins R, Townsend C, Silberberg D. Mental and neurological health profile of Ecuador. International Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;5(4):93-5. https://doi.org/10.1192/S1749367600002289. [ Links ]

Malo-Serrano M, Malo-Corral N. Health reform in Ecuador: never again the right to health as a privilege. Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica. 2014;31(4):754-61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25597730/ [ Links ]

World Health Organization. Atlas: country resources for neurological disorders 2004: results of a collaborative study of the World Health Organization and the World Federation of Neurology. World Health Organization; 2004. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43075 [ Links ]

Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos del Ecuador (INEC). Proyección De La Población Ecuatoriana, Por Años Calendario, Según Cantones 2010-2020. 2020, INEC. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/proyecciones-poblacionales/ [ Links ]

Consejo de Educacion Superior. Resolucion del Pleno del Consejo de Educacion Superior: Aprobar los programas de cuarto nivel en: Endocrinologia de la Universidad de Las Americas-UDLA, Ortopedia y traumatologia de la Universidad de Las Americas-UDLA, Neurologia de la Universidad de Las Americas-UDLA, Cuidados Paliativos de la Pontifia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador-PUCE, Enfermería en Salud Familiar y Comunitaria de la de la Pontifia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador-PUCE, Infectologia de la Pontifia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador-PUCE, Epidemiologia de la Universidad UTE. RPC-SO-23-No.502-2020. Quito: Consejo de Educacion Superior; 2020. http://gaceta.ces.gob.ec/inicio.html?id_documento=242080 [ Links ]

Consejo de Education Superior. Informe del programa de especializacion en Neurologia de la Universidad de las Americas - UDLA. CES-CPTS-2020-0370-M. RPC-SO -23-No.502-2020. Quito: Consejo de Education Superior; 2020. http://gaceta.ces.gob.ec/inicio.html?id_documento=242021 [ Links ]

Consejo de Educacion Superior. Informe técnico - académico de ajuste curricular no sustantivo de los programas de especializaciones en el campo de la salud, presentado por la Universidad de Las Américas. Memorando CES-CPTS-2022-0341-M CES-CPTS-2022-0347-M. RPC-SO-33-No.519-2022. Quito: Consejo de Education Superior; 2022. http://gaceta.ces.gob.ec/inicio.html?id_documento=251477 [ Links ]

Consejo de Educacion Superior. Resolucion del Pleno del Consejo de Educacion Superior: Aprobar los programas de cuarto nivel en: Endocrinologia de la Universidad de Las Americas-UDLA, Ortopedia y traumatologia de la Universidad de Las Americas-UDLA, Neurologia de la Universidad de Las Americas-UDLA, Cuidados Paliativos de la Pontifia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador-PUCE, Enfermería en Salud Familiar y Comunitaria de la de la Pontifia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador-PUCE, Infectologia de la Pontifia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador-PUCE, Epidemiologia de la Universidad UTE. RPC-SO-23-No.519-2022. Quito: Consejo de Educacion Superior; 2022. http://gaceta.ces.gob.ec/inicio.html?id_documento=242080 [ Links ]

Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de Ecuador. Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Quito: Tribunal Constitucional del Ecuador. Registro oficial Nro. 2008 Oct 20;449:79-93 https://www.asambleanacional.gob.ec/sites/default/files/documents/old/constitucion_de_bolsillo.pdf [ Links ]

Lucio R, Villacrés N, Henríquez R. The health system of Ecuador. Salud publica de Mexico. 2011 Jan;53:s177-87. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21877083/ [ Links ]

Lopez-Cevallos DF, Chi C. Health care utilization in Ecuador: a multilevel analysis of socio-economic determinants and inequality issues. Health policy and planning. 2010 May 1;25(3):209-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czp052 [ Links ]

Aldulaimi S, Mora FE. A primary care system to improve health care efficiency: lessons from Ecuador. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2017 May 1;30(3):380-3. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.160304 [ Links ]

Rodriguez A, Romero-Sandoval A, Sandoval BA, Romero N. Medical specialist distributions in Ecuador: a geographical and temporal analysis of data from 2000 to 2017. BMC Health Services Research. 2022 Dec;22(1):1-2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08056-5 [ Links ]

Serrano Duenas M. La Neurologia en Ecuador. Revista Ecuatoriana de Neurologia. 2007 Jan 1;16(3):163-4. http://revecuatneurol.com/magazine_issue_article/la-neurologia-en-el-ecuador/ [ Links ]

Rojas JE. Reforma universitaria en el Ecuador. Etapa de transición. Innovación Educativa. 2011;11(57):59-67. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=179422350008 [ Links ]

Wong-Ayoub JA, Andrés-Suárez S, Santana D, Meza-Venegas J, Urquizo-Rodríguez E, Arévalo-Mora M, Avellán C, Moreno-Zambrano D. Psychiatrists Available In The Ecuadorian Public Health System And Psychiatry Residency Programs In Ecuador-A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Revista Ecuatoriana de Neurología. 2022 Sep;31(2):59-64. https://doi.org/10.46997/revecuatneurol31200059 [ Links ]

Medina MT, Munsat T, Portera-Sánchez A, Durón RM, Becker CA, Holden KR, WFN Education Committee . Developing a neurology training program in Honduras: a joint project of neurologists in Honduras and the World Federation of Neurology. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2007 Feb 15;253(1-2):7-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2006.07.005 [ Links ]

Israel K, Strander SM, Pierre S, Martineau L, Morse ME, Berkowitz AL. Development of a neurology training program in Haiti. Neurology. 2019 Feb 19;92(8):391-4. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006960 [ Links ]

Zinoviev R, Krumholz HM, Pirruccio K, Forman H. Association of Graduate Medical Education With Hospital Performance and Patient Outcomes. JAMA Network Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2034196. https:/doi.org/ 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34196 [ Links ]

Freire JM, Infante A, de Aguiar AC, Carbajo P. An analysis of the medical specialty training system in Spain. Human resources for health. 2015 Dec;13(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0038-y [ Links ]

Asamblea Nacional de la Republica del Ecuador. Ley Organica de Carrera Sanitaria. Registro Oficial. Quito. 1er de Septiembre, 2022. ESACC No 139 - 29 páginas. http://esacc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/storage/api/v1/10_DWL_FL/eyJjYXJwZXRhIjoicm8iLCJ1dWlkIjoiYmRiYzZkYjgtNzA0MC00Yjk5LTk0OWYtZmQ4ZmE3YmYyYjk0LnBkZiJ9 [ Links ]

Sisa I, Mena B, Teran E. The negative impact of ad hoc committees for ethical evaluation: The case of COVID‐19‐related research in Ecuador. Developing World Bioethics. 2021 Mar;21(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12307 [ Links ]

Ortiz-Prado E, Fernández-Naranjo R. Impacto de la COVID-19 en el Ecuador: De Los Datos Inexactos a Las Muertes en Exceso Impact Of COVID-19 In Ecuador: From Inaccurate Data To Using Excess Mortality. Revista Ecuatoriana de Neurología. 2020;29(2). https://doi.org/10.46997/revecuatneurol29200008 [ Links ]

Received: January 02, 2023; Accepted: July 03, 2023

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License