SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 issue1Influencia de aditivos (polímeros y polialuminio) en las propiedades físico-mecánicas de mezclas asfálticas en calientePotencial geológico del alófano en la provincia de Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


FIGEMPA: Investigación y Desarrollo

On-line version ISSN 2602-8484Print version ISSN 1390-7042

Abstract

VIERA ARROBA, Luisa Paulina; QUIZANGA MARTINEZ, Diego Marcelo  and  ANDINO CARRANCO, José Luis. Análisis estático no lineal de edificios aporticados de hormigón armado aplicando normativa ecuatoriana, colombiana y peruana. Figempa [online]. 2020, vol.9, n.1, pp.72-78. ISSN 2602-8484.  https://doi.org/10.29166/revfig.v1i1.2186.

Ecuador is located in a high seismicity zone. If we consider that many Ecuadorian structures are vulnerable, it is evident that the seismic risk in Ecuador is high. If the structure’s vulnerability is reduced the seismic risk will decrease, in this context the Building Construction Codes regulate the minimum requirements to obtain safe structures for their users, however, there are not many studies comparing the vulnerability obtained using Ecuadorian Construction Code (NEC-15) regarding the vulnerability obtained using other Constructions Codes. To understand the degree of vulnerability of reinforced concrete structures designed with NEC-15 has regarding those designed using National Construction Codes of Ecuador’s nearby countries, will allow us to recommend improvements to NEC-15. To do that, we designed 18 reinforced concrete building using NEC-15 and Colombia and Peru Construction Codes (NSR10 and E030, respectively). Considering the recommendations of these 3 National Constructions Codes, we obtain parameters required to carry out a nonlinear static analysis and from this data, we assessed the vulnerability of these buildings using the capacity spectrum method. We concluded that the application of the NSR-10 reflects a lower degree of vulnerability in the structures, even though buildings designed using E.030 were more rigid, also we found that structures designed under the same conditions with NEC-15 are more vulnerable than structures designed using NSR and E030. Still that, this vulnerability may change if other structural configurations are used, which we suggested as future work.

Keywords : structural design; structural vulnerability; non-linear static analysis; seismic risk.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )