Abstract

SAN MARTIN GARCIA, Rómulo Ignacio. Inconsistency of the analytic-empirical dimension from cognitive brain conformation. Sophia [online]. 2017, n.22, pp.55-81. ISSN 1390-8626.  https://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n22.2017.02.

There is an inconsistency of the philosophical analytic perspective in front of the brain structure; this is more than regression towards the atoms of knowledge, which for the classical analytic is on the outside. The cerebral cognitive architecture can be seen as a synthetic whole that combines the internal dimensions of human nature with the external, that is to say that takes into account both the exteriority and the naturalness and part of both; The intelligent ordering knows how to embroider the instinctive and limbic with the data that gives the sensoriality and in turn the instinctive-limbic in the linguistic-logical and the sensorial in the linguistic-logic for the planning and the decision, very own elements and Simultaneously simultaneous in the brain structure. Therefore, to absolutize the analytic is really a reduction of knowledge, moreover, the reduction of the meaning of content to facts and matter, is a contradictory brain, by the very nature of its structure that does not partialize or reduce anything As if it is the case of the analytic. The classic empiricism and that of the last century in front of the studies of the structure and functioning of the brain, turns out to be partial, because they possess a reductionist structure that is assimilated totalitarian. It is not that it is totally invalid, but it is partially valid, that is to say, if the contents are analyzed from the cerebral sensoriality, it is more or less coherent, but at present, to remain only in that field and interpretation, and cognitive impertinence.

Keywords : Crystallized intelligence; Fluid intelligence; limbic system; empiricism; analytical.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )