SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue22The “clean hands” doctrine in investment Arbitration and its applicability to the Ecuadorian legal system.Re-thinking the requirement of making an investment in accordance with domestic laws as a substantive right and a cause of action for host states under the BITs author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Iuris Dictio

On-line version ISSN 2528-7834Print version ISSN 1390-6402

Abstract

MUNOZ, José Gustavo Prieto. Precedent in International Investment Law: the argumentative value of previous arbitration decisions. Iuris Dictio [online]. 2018, n.22, pp.89-99. ISSN 2528-7834.  https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.v22i22.1187.

The article studies the constant use of previous awards in investment arbitration, where parties and arbitral tribunals frequently resort to prior arbitration decisions to justify and argue their own decisions. In this sense, previous arbitration decisions have been used to give shape to abstract norms such as the Fair and Equitable Treatment standard. In this regard, it can be affirmed that the reference of arbitral tribunals to previous cases is not only referential, but also forms part of the construction of obligations that are required of the states. This article studies different explanations that both the doctrine and the arbitral tribunals themselves have developed to conceptualize the use of prior arbitration decisions in international investment law. Additionally, it is argued about the need to conceive of these previous decisions as an expression of the exercise of public authority by investment arbitration.

Keywords : Legitimacy; Arbitral precedent; International investment law; Public authority.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )