SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue21The use of extra-systemic precedents in the dialogue between the Inter-American Court and the European Court of Human Rights: an empirical investigationThe identity of the constitution and constitutional identity: Opening up a discourse between the Global South and Global North author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Iuris Dictio

On-line version ISSN 2528-7834Print version ISSN 1390-6402

Abstract

NEGISHI, Yota. Relative authorities: constitutional reasonable resistances against Inter-American Court’s doctrines. Iuris Dictio [online]. 2018, n.21, pp.49-61. ISSN 2528-7834.

This article illustrates the constitutional reasoning upon which domestic courts exhibit resistance to relativize Inter-American Court’s doctrines. The San José Court has given constitutional reasoning in a dual dimension, the doctrine of corpus juris internacional, and the doctrine of control de convencionalidad. Constitutional reasonable resistance against such Inter-American authoritative doctrines has become manifest in recent cases concerning amnesty in transitional justice, conflicting rights between private parties, and the invalidation of domestic decisions. To overcome mutual backlashes between Inter-American and domestic judges, this paper seeks their potential of a more harmonious, democracy-oriented interaction on the basis of shared constitutional reasoning.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )